Showing posts with label mobile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mobile. Show all posts

Monday, 30 September 2013

Hackers target social media, step up mobile attacks

Social media has become a top target of hackers and mobile devices are expanding that target, IBM reported last week in its X-Force 2013 Mid-Year Trend and Risk Report.

Attacks on businesses are getting increasingly sophisticated, the report said. Some attacks studied by IBM researchers were opportunistic—exploiting unpatched and untested web applications vulnerable to basic SQL injection or cross-site scripting.

Others were successful, the report continued, because they violated the basic trust between end user and sites or social media personalities thought to be safe and legitimate.

"Social media has become a new playground for attackers," said Kevin Skapinetz, program director for product strategy for IBM Security Systems.

social

The report noted that a growing trend this year is the takeover of social media profiles that have a large number of followers. The trend continues to play a pivotal role in the way attackers are reaching their targets.

"It's one thing to get an email or spam from someone you've never heard of," Skapinetz said in an interview. "It's another thing to have one of your friends have their account compromised and send you a link that might interest you."

Traditional sources of online aggravation can't resist the siren call of social media, either. "Even if email is used in an attack, it will be under guise of coming from a social media account," he said. "Attackers are becoming more operationally sophisticated."

Social media attacks can affect more than the usual suspects, too. Social media exploits affect more than individuals; they can negatively impact enterprise brand reputation and cause financial losses, the report said.

Mobile devices are also becoming a hacker magnet. "Although mobile vulnerabilities continue to grow at a rapid pace, we still see them as a small percentage of overall vulnerabilities reported in the year," the report said.

What may be making matters worse is the proliferation of mobile devices in the workplace under Bring Your Own Device Programs. "BYOD—what a nightmare that can be for any organization," HBGary's Threat Intelligence Director, Matthew Standart, said in an interview.

mobile security

"It's difficult to protect your data even when you own all your devices and getting visibility into all your devices is a challenge in itself," Standard said. "Allowing users to bring their own devices increases the complexity tenfold."

The IBM report also noted that Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks are being used for more than just disrupting service at target sites. The attacks are being used as a distraction, allowing attackers to breach other systems in the enterprise.

"Both attacks and attack threats are being used as decoys," Marc Gaffan, co-founder of Incapsula, said in an interview.

"The attackers will bring down a website, get the IT people focused in a certain direction, tie up their resources on the DDoS attack while a more sophisticated breach is performed with no one paying attention," Gaffan said.

A decoy attack could also be used in conjunction with a phishing attack, he added. For example, a phishing message could be sent to a bank's customers asking them to use an alternative URL because the bank is having trouble with its common web address. A recipient may follow good security practices and paste the common URL for the bank in his browser.

Because the bank is under a DDoS attack, however, they can't connect to the institution, he said. So, in desperation, they click on the URL in the phishing message and get infected.

Those kinds of misdirection DDoS attacks, though, haven't become mainstream. "They are occurring, but they're relatively rare," said Daniel Peck, a research scientist at Barracuda Networks.

The IBM report also questioned the dedication of many organizations to sound security basics. "Many of the breaches reported in the last year were a result of poorly applied security fundamentals and policies and could have been mitigated by putting some basic security hygiene into practice," the researchers wrote.

"Attackers seem to be capitalizing on this 'lack of security basics' by using a model of operational sophistication that allows them to increase their return on exploit," they wrote.

"The idea that even basic security hygiene is not upheld in organizations, leads us to believe that, for a variety of reasons, companies are struggling with a commitment to apply basic security fundamentals," the researchers wrote.

Barry Shteiman, senior security strategist with Imperva, said in an interview that the lack of adherence to basics could be due to a fundamental misunderstanding of security by companies. "They don't understand the difference between a safety belt and auto insurance," he said. "They don't understand that it's more important to protect themselves than to preserve their reputation after a breach has been made."

John Mello writes on technology and cyber security for a number of online publications and is former managing editor of the Boston Business Journal and Boston Phoenix.
More by John P. Mello Jr


View the original article here

Friday, 27 September 2013

iPhone 5s fingerprint scanner could be mobile security game changer

On Friday the iPhone 5s will be out on the street, and with it, Apple’s fingerprint scanning technology. There are still some concerns about how Apple is implementing and managing fingerprint authentication, but as long as the iPhone 5s doesn’t fumble completely, the new smartphone could finally spur mainstream adoption of the technology.

As Apple revealed a couple of weeks ago, the home button on the new iPhone 5s is also a fingerprint scanner. Rather than using a passcode, you can now unlock the device just by holding your finger on the home button.

Touch IDThe iPhone 5s includes a capacitive fingerprint scanner.

The iPhone 5s isn’t the first mobile device with a fingerprint scanner. The Motorola Atrix included fingerprint authentication back in 2011. Apparently, even Motorola forgot about the Atrix, though, because it had the audacity to send out a tweet slamming the idea of using a fingerprint with a mobile device.

Paul Henry, security and forensic analyst at Lumension believes that the iPhone 5s fingerprint authentication could prove to be a game changer. “There are two factors that will determine the real success of this new feature, which has undeniable potential,” he says. “First, reliability and second, security—though as a security researcher, I have to say it should really be security first.”

There are questions about how Apple is scanning and storing the fingerprint data. If someone guesses or compromises your passcode, you can just change it to a new one. But, you can’t change your fingerprints. Some worry that a thief can simply use an image or picture of your fingerprint gain access to a user’s iPhone, the same way Android’s facial recognition authentication can be fooled with a picture of the device owner. It wouldn’t be hard to get your fingerprint—your iPhone will likely be covered with dozens of samples.

Macworld contributor Rich Mogull does an excellent job explaining why that probably isn’t an issue. In a nutshell, Apple is using capacitive scanning that looks at more than just the image of your fingerprint, and it’s most likely not storing the actual fingerprint anywhere on the iPhone where it might be compromised.

Mogull hypothesizes that Apple is probably analyzing the fingerprint and using unique data from it to generate a mathematical representation or template. By this logic, when you touch the home button, your fingerprint is run through the algorithm again, and the results are compared to the template to ensure they match. These are educated guesses, though, and the actual implementation may work differently.

Touch IDApple revealed the details of the fingerprint scanner at the iPhone 5s launch event.

“What we need to know is how good a job did Apple actually do securing the biometric data,” Henry says. “They say it’s encrypted and not shared with other applications, but we’ll have to wait and see how it works in practice.”

Henry also has some concerns about just how much access someone gets if the fingerprint authentication is bypassed or compromised. “If a single fingerprint grants access to other services (particularly iCloud), that’s a frightening prospect if Apple hasn’t done a truly expert job at securing that local credential,” he says.

Dwayne Melancon, CTO for Tripwire, says, “In general, multifactor authentication is a good idea and biometrics, in particular, are good as long as they work properly. Early reports of Apple’s biometric implementation are promising, and even if there is some rate of false identification, this approach is still more secure than a four-digit PIN.”

One crucial thing for IT admins to understand is how device access works in the event that the fingerprint scanner is not an option. What if a user breaks their finger and it’s in a cast, or the home button fingerprint sensor malfunctions?

“From an enterprise perspective, I would wait until the security of this implementation of fingerprint scanning has been tested ‘in real life’ before adopting it broadly,” Melancon cautions.

Biometric security is nothing new, but it has yet to really catch on as a mainstream method of authentication. The password or passcode remains king. Apple has a huge market presence, though, and the iOS ecosystem commands a great deal of respect. If the iPhone 5s fingerprint scanner lives up to expectations, this could be the tipping point that turns it into the new default standard.

If Apple stumbles or falls on its face, though, it could set biometric security back a few years. If there are too many false negatives or false positives, or it turns out that the fingerprint data isn’t stored as securely as it should be, or there are other problems with the fingerprint scanner, it will tarnish the reputation of biometrics with average users, and it will take a long time to recover.

Tony is principal analyst with the Bradley Strategy Group, providing analysis and insight on tech trends. He is a prolific writer on a range of technology topics, has authored a number of books, and is a frequent speaker at industry events.
More by Tony Bradley


View the original article here

Intuit revamps Quickbooks Online for ease of use, mobile devices

Users of the online version of Intuit's popular QuickBooks small-business accounting software may find their workdays becoming a bit easier to manage, thanks to a new user interface and mobile application support.

Intuit has completed a "complete relaunch and rebuild" of QuickBooks Online's look and feel, said Daniel Wernikoff, senior vice president and general manager of small business financial solutions.

QuickBooks has about 4.5 million users around the world, with 500,000 using the online edition and the rest running the desktop version, Wernikoff said.

Intuit launched the online product about 10 years ago but only started getting serious traction for it recently. "What we saw with customers is they weren't ready for online then," he said.

But the momentum has shifted radically in the other direction. While three or four years ago only about 5 percent of new customers were choosing the online version, Intuit expects online to account for more than half of new purchases by the end of the year, Wernikoff said.

The uptick is likely being boosted by new features introduced last year that allowed the online version to be configured to support a wide variety of tax regulations and languages. As a result, QuickBooks Online is now being used by customers in more than 100 countries.

The update announced Monday seems to bring QuickBooks beyond pure accounting and into the realm of CRM (customer relationship management).

New mobile applications for iOS and Android devices allow users to pull up data while in the field, such as the complete financial history of dealings with a particular customer. Transactions conducted through the mobile applications get synchronized back to the customer's QuickBooks Online account.

Also on tap in the new release is better integration for the online product with third-party applications. "The problem has been that when we visit small businesses, most are using 10 applications and most of them aren't provided by us," Wernikoff said.

Intuit has also tried to make it easier for less computer-savvy business owners to get started quickly with the application.

When a new customer logs into QuickBooks Online for the first time, they are presented with a wizard-like interface that asks them questions about the industry they're in, how they prefer to be paid and other matters. The application's look and feel is automatically configured, based on those responses and on the way customers in similar industries have set up their systems.

As QuickBooks Online grows more popular, the user base may end up including more and more customers who once used the desktop version. Intuit's sunset policy, which essentially forces customers to repurchase the software every few years unless they don't want support or the use of add-on extensions, is a long-standing gripe among QuickBooks users.

"All desktop companies have a sunset policy," Wernikoff said. However, he acknowledged Intuit has a "good chunk of desktop customers who get frustrated by that requirement."

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for the IDG News Service.
More by Chris Kanaracus


View the original article here

Verizon and AT&T should face a bigger mobile rival, Sprint CFO says

The U.S. mobile industry would be more competitive with one less carrier, Sprint’s CFO said on Thursday.

The problem now is that Sprint and T-Mobile US are so much smaller than the top two carriers, AT&T and Verizon Wireless, Joe Euteneuer said in an onstage interview at a Goldman Sachs conference in New York. Based on the experience of other industries, closer parity is better, he said.

“When you get down to three comparable-sized players, you get much more effective competition,” Euteneuer said.

Sprint has approximately 55 million subscribers and T-Mobile about 43 million, while Verizon Wireless and AT&T both are around 100 million, though they count customers differently. T-Mobile US CFO Braxton Carter reportedly said Wednesday that a merger between his company and Sprint would be the logical next step in the industry’s consolidation. Some industry analysts also believe the U.S. will eventually go to three competitors, as other affluent countries have.

Though more consolidation might be good for the country, that doesn’t mean it’ll happen, Euteneuer acknowledged. Whether the U.S. should have three or four big mobile carriers is a hotly debated topic, and both the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission have some control over whether another big deal could take place. Regulators nixed AT&T’s attempt to buy T-Mobile in 2011.

MetroPCS, Leap Wireless, and some smaller players have recently been snapped up by big carriers, and Sprint was acquired by SoftBank earlier this year, but the top four operators have stayed the same.

Also at the conference, Euteneuer said Sprint’s combination with SoftBank, which is a major carrier in Japan, finally gives it the kind of scale that Verizon and AT&T have long enjoyed when negotiating with device makers. “I do believe that there is a benefit there,” he said.

Sprint is currently focused on building out its network, which will use several different cellular frequency bands as well as Wi-Fi for better coverage and capacity than it offers today, Euteneuer said.

The company is still building out LTE on its 1.9GHz band and expects to reach 200 million people on that system by the end of the year. It’s using the 800MHz band for voice service now and plans to start deploying LTE on those frequencies at the beginning of next year. By the end of the year, LTE will be available on more than 5,000 cells that Sprint acquired with Clearwire, which use 2.5GHz spectrum. Finally, early next year Sprint will start talking about its plans for LTE on its own 2.5GHz frequencies, Euteneuer said.

By the end of this year, the company will start offering handsets that can take advantage of all those networks with radios for the 800MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz bands, he said.


View the original article here

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

Photoshop Elements 12 review: Mobile albums and content-aware tools dominate new release

Adobe’s annual update to Photoshop Elements, its consumer image organizer and editor, offers a satisfying array of new features. While changes in version 12’s Organizer focus on syncing and sharing photos for access on mobile devices, the Elements 12 Editor includes slick Instagram-inspired effects, textures, frames, new guided edits, and a content-aware move tool. Even more exciting is an intuitive image-correction method that remembers how you use it and a red-eye tool that works on animals—two features that even its flagship sibling Photoshop CC doesn’t have.

Elements 12 OrganizerOne huge challenge in mobile photography is getting images off of your device. In version 12, the Elements Organizer lets you create mobile albums with Adobe Revel—a free online storage, syncing, and sharing utility, similar to Apple’s iCloud and Photo Stream. The free Revel iOS app also includes handy editing abilities. A Revel account gives you unlimited photo imports for one month, and 50 photos per month thereafter (a $6 monthly fee gives you unlimited imports). You can import photos into Revel and create mobile albums on your iOS device or in the desktop Elements 12 Organizer; you can them share automatically sync between them and share them via email.

The album is viewable in a Web browser (on a pleasing, but uncustomizable grid on a black background) in the invitee’s own Revel account or Elements 12 Organizer—a great way to share vacation photos. You can share single images via social media, with Twitter a welcome new addition.

Rounding out the upgrades to the Organizer is the ability to see Places and Event tags in the Tags/Info panel. You just drag and drop a tag onto an image to apply it; and in Places view, you can click a location on the map and choose Show Media to see just those photos.

Once you share a mobile album, others can add, edit, and even download photos (if you granted permission to do so when you shared the album), though only the person who uploaded a photo can delete it. Elements 12 EditorIn the Adobe Elements Editor’s Quick mode, you’ll spot three new buttons at the bottom right of the window: Effects, Textures, and Frames. Applying these Instagram-style treatments is a single-click affair, though clicking the single Reset Image button at the top of these panels removes all the effects, textures, or frames that you’ve applied. To undo specific effects, you have to click into each panel separately and then click Undo from the Action Bar. It’s a little awkward.

In Quick mode, you can create Instagram-style treatments using the new Effects, Textures, and Frames buttons (the Light Leak effect and Aged frame are shown here). Click and drag a photo to reposition it within the frame. Switch to Guided mode and you’ll find three new step-by-step techniques: Zoom Burst Effect (for simulating motion), Puzzle Effect (for creating a puzzle out of your photo), and Restore Old Photo. That last one walks you through a complicated series of tasks including cropping, using the Spot Healing Brush, the Healing Brush, Clone Stamp tools, Dust Removal (which triggers the Dust & Scratches filter), Auto Levels, Auto Contrast, Auto Color Correction, conversion to black-and-white, and sharpening. Whew!

The new Puzzle Effect guided edit lets you choose the puzzle-piece size, as well as select and extract individual pieces. When you’re finished extracting pieces, you can switch to Expert mode, activate the layer of an extracted piece, and use the Free Transform tool to rotate it. Take a peek in the Enhance menu, and you’ll find a new Auto Smart Tone feature for automatic lighting and contrast corrections. Using a unique, on-image interface, you can fine-tune the autocorrections by clicking and dragging a joystick controller in the direction of a corrected image thumbnail (they’re positioned at each corner of the dialog box). By dragging the joystick toward a thumbnail, you apply more of that particular correction.

If the object you want to move has free space around it, and you don’t move it very far, the Content-Aware Move tool works well. That said, you may need to do some cleanup with the Clone Stamp tool. Last but not least, photographers will appreciate the File menu’s new ‘Open in Camera Raw’ command for opening supported file formats in the Camera Raw plug-in; and, happily, you can now delete layers by pressing the Delete key on your keyboard.

The new Auto Smart Tone feature is intuitive: It remembers how you fine-tune corrections in order to apply them the next time you use the feature. The interface also includes a handy Before/After switch at the bottom left. Bottom lineFamily memoirists will love the Restore Old Photos guided edit, while the Auto Smart Tone feature saves time for the snap-happy. Fixing a pet’s eyes and repositioning items in a photo is highly useful, and the former is unique to this program. iPhonography fans will dig the mobile albums, and scrapbookers will adore Effects, Frames, and Textures. If you use Elements regularly, this upgrade is worth the money; if you’ve outgrown iPhoto, then Photoshop Elements 12 is the next logical step.

Lesa Snider, founder of PhotoLesa.com, is on a mission to teach the world to create better graphics. She's the author of Photoshop CC: The Missing Manual, coauthor of iPhoto '11: The Missing Manual (Pogue Press/O'Reilly), a creativeLIVE instructor, stock photographer, and a columnist for Photoshop User magazine.
More by Lesa Snider


View the original article here

Friday, 20 September 2013

Mobile app download tally will soar above 102 billion this year

Mobile apps continue to be a major driver of the smartphone and tablet ecosystem and are a big reason people purchase and use those devices.

Gartner on Thursday said the number of overall mobile app downloads -- both free and paid -- will soar to 102 billion by the end of this year, up from 64 billion in 2012. By 2017, the number of app downloads should reach nearly 269 billion.

[ Understand how to both manage and benefit from the consumerization of IT with InfoWorld's "Consumerization Digital Spotlight" PDF special report. | For a quick, smart take on the news you'll be talking about, check out InfoWorld TechBrief -- subscribe today. ]

Mobile app revenues will be $26 billion in 2013, up from $18 billion last year, Gartner said. That $26 billion in revenues comes from paid downloads and in-app purchases -- even though only 9 percent of all downloads this year cost money. The rest, 91 percent, are free.

Gartner projected this upward trend for app downloads will continue for its entire forecast period through 2017, with the strongest growth through 2014, when nearly 139 billion downloads are projected. As the global market for smartphones and tablets gets more saturated, users will have accumulated a portfolio of apps so new app downloads will slow.

According to Gartner, the Android and iOS app stores combined will command 90 percent of global downloads in 2017. Today, the two operating systems have by far the largest app stores, with Apple reporting in June that it had more than 900,000 apps, and Google saying in July that it had more than 1 million Google Play store apps.

Both stores have rich ecosystems and large and active developer communities, Gartner noted. The absence of active developer communities is one reason Windows Phone and BlackBerry each have less than 5 percent of smartphone market, according to various analysts.

The trend toward downloading fewer apps in coming years is reflected in what Gartner calls average monthly downloads. For iPhones and iPads, the average monthly download per device will drop from 4.9 in 2013 to 3.9 in 2017. For Android phones and tablets, the same measure will decline from 6.2 in 2013 to 5.8 in 2017.

The reduction relates "to the overall trend of users using the same apps more often rather than downloading new ones," said Brian Blau, a Gartner analyst.

Free apps make up the overwhelming number of apps downloaded: 90 percent in 2012, 91 percent this year, and a projected 95 percent in 2017. About 60 percent of apps in the Apple App Store today are free, while nearly 80 percent are free in Google Play, Blau said.

Gartner also said that in-app purchases make up 11 percent of all app store revenue today, a figure that will rise to almost 50 percent by 2017. An in-app purchase occurs when a user downloads a game, productivity, music or other app and then purchases added features from within the app. The mechanism for creating an in-app purchase requires a developer to write special code.

In-app purchases are a significant portion of Apple App Store revenue on iPhones, Gartner said, without giving an exact amount.

"Users are not put off by the fact that they have already paid for an app and are willing to spend more if they are happy with the experience," Blau said.

In fact, the growth of in-app purchasing will pose a challenge for developers, Gartner said. "Users only pay when they are happy with the experience and developers have to work hard to earn the revenue through good design and performance," Blau said.

Matt Hamblen covers mobile and wireless, smartphones and other handhelds, and wireless networking for Computerworld. Follow Matt on Twitter at @matthamblen or subscribe to Matt's RSS feed. His email address is mhamblen@computerworld.com.

See more by Matt Hamblen on Computerworld.com.

Read more about mobile apps in Computerworld's Mobile Apps Topic Center.


View the original article here

Monday, 9 September 2013

Mobile browsers get a workout, with Google's Chrome leading

Mobile browsing continued to post gains last month at the expense of personal computers, a trend that has put Google into the second spot behind Microsoft as the browser maker with the longest reach, a Web metrics company said Sunday.

According to Net Applications, an estimated 13.4 percent of all users accessed the Internet in August from a smartphone or tablet, breaking a six-month-old record. Most of the rest of the world's online users—85.8 percent—went online with a desktop browser on a personal computer.

The increase in mobile browsing has pushed Google past Mozilla as the browser maker with the second-largest combined desktop-plus-mobile user share.

Google's combined user share of 17.5 percent was earned on the basis of its No. 2 spot in mobile generated by the Android and Chrome browsers. That's in contrast to Net Applications' estimate of Chrome's desktop share of 16 percent, down more than 1.7 percentage points in August.

Apple was the other browser maker that benefited most from mobile, with a combined user share of 12.2 percent, of which nearly two-thirds came from Safari on iOS, the mobile operating system that powers all iPhones, iPads and iPod Touches.

Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE) and Mozilla's Firefox remain the two browsers whose usage shares have been hit hardest by the shift toward mobile, as Microsoft continues to struggle to post global gains in smartphones and tablets, and Mozilla has only recently gotten into the mobile market with its Firefox OS.

IE continued to dominate the desktop, with an August share of 57.6 percent, but its faint appearance in Net Applications' mobile statistics lowered its combined share to 49.6 percent. That's slightly up from March, when Computerworld last visited the subject, but the increase was due to a resurgent IE on traditional PCs, where the browser has returned to levels last seen in April 2011.

Firefox's total share again suffered from lack of any mobile punch: Mozilla has an Android version of Firefox in play, but its share was so small that Net Applications did not even note it. Mozilla's Firefox OS, a browser-based mobile operating system that has garnered support from carriers in China, Spain and elsewhere, has only recently started shipping on a limited number of phones. For August, Firefox's combined share was 16.1 percent, several percentage points lower than its desktop-only number and down from March's 17.7 percent.

browsers

Norwegian browser maker Opera Software bulked up its very small desktop user share with an almost-as-large contribution from its Opera Mini mobile browser. Opera's combined share for August was 2.5 percent.

Mobile browsing overall is on an upswing again after several months of stalled or declining share. August's 13.4 percent was a new record for mobile, cracking the February standard. Projections based on the three-month trends hint that mobile will probably account for 20 percent of all browsing by May 2014.

Net Applications measures browser usage on smartphones, tablets and personal computers by tabulating approximately 160 million unique visitors each month who browse to the sites it monitors for customers.

When desktop and mobile browser user shares are combined, Google takes the second spot from Mozilla, and Apple's Safari is a stronger fourth-place rival than its minor desktop presence indicates. (Data: Net Applications.)

Follow TechHive on Tumblr today.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news.
More by Gregg Keizer, Computerworld


View the original article here

From calculators to tablets, Intel focuses on the mobile era

Intel’s dominance of the chip market is starting to wane as PC shipments slump and smartphone and tablet adoption grows, but the manufacturer will try to prove it can make fast and power-efficient processors for mobile devices at its annual developer gathering next week.

At the Intel Developer Forum next week, the company will introduce low-power Atom chips code-named Bay Trail, which will go into tablets that are priced from $150. The show will also be a litmus test for new CEO Brian Krzanich, who will deliver the keynote speech on Sept. 10 and highlight Intel’s long-term strategy as the company diversifies into the mobile market.

Intel’s Brian KrzanichPCWorld (US)Intel CEO Brian Krzanich

Krzanich replaced the popular Paul Otellini in May this year, and has put mobile chips at the top of his priority list. He has also created a “new devices” group that will focus on emerging areas like wearables. The chip maker is already planning to release a TV service through its own set-top box, and Krzanich may touch upon the wearable devices during his opening keynote on Sept. 10.

A distraction will be an Apple product launch event on Sept. 10, which starts just one hour after Krzanich’s keynote begins.

Apple’s iPhone 5 launch event was held last year on Sept. 10, one day ahead of IDF, but chatter about the smartphone and other Apple products lingered on the IDF floor for the entire show. Apple is expected to launch new iPhones at its event.

The transition to mobile is one of the more challenging issues for Intel since the chip maker made its first 4004 chip for calculators in 1971. Aided by Windows, Intel went on to thrive in the PC market, but is now just catching up to ARM in tablets and smartphones. Though the Wintel alliance remains alive, Intel has now adopted the widely used Android operating systems for mobile devices as it tries to gain market share.

Intel has also struggled to dispel a notion that its low-power mobile chips are watered-down versions of its power-hungry x86 PC chips, an idea the company will try to debunk at the show through its Bay Trail chips. Based on the Silvermont architecture, the chips have an all-new design and will be available in dual-core and quad-core variants.

Intel claims Bay Trail tablets will have longer battery life and better performance compared to its Atom chips. Intel hopes Bay Trail will be a legitimate competitor to ARM, and the companies have already traded barbs on superiority in performance and power efficiency.

Intel has said Bay Trail tablets will start at $150. The first few models will likely be priced at about $400 or more and run Windows 8.1, but some Android models shipping toward the end of the year will be lower in price.

Tablets with ARM processors and Android are available for under $100 in some cases, though some popular brands such as Google’s Nexus 7 start at over $200.

Intel is also extending Bay Trail chips to low-cost Windows 8, Android and Chrome OS laptops and desktops. The company will also highlight developments in Ultrabooks, which are thin and light laptops that can also function as tablets.

Adoption of Ultrabooks has been poor due to high product prices, but Lenovo and Dell in the past month have announced new laptops and hybrids based on Intel’s fourth-generation Core processors, code-named Haswell.

The chip maker is also expected to announce new server chips, and will also touch upon new data center technologies such as optical networking. Intel is tuning many of its server chips specific to software applications, and many technology briefing sessions will be focused on software development for big data, supercomputing and mobile devices.

Intel is also dabbling in the area of open-source PCs and the “Internet of things.” In addition, the company will demonstrate Thunderbolt 2, which will transfer data between host PCs and peripherals at twice the speed of its current 10G bps (bits per second) rate.

Agam Shah is a reporter for the IDG News Service in New York. He covers hardware including PCs, servers, tablets, chips, semiconductors, consumer electronics and peripherals.
More by Agam Shah, IDG News Service


View the original article here

Tuesday, 3 September 2013

Verizon to buy out Vodafone's stake in mobile unit for $130B

Verizon Communications has reached an agreement to buy Vodafone Group's 45 percent stake in its Verizon Wireless subsidiary for $130 billion. Under the deal, Verizon will take 100 percent ownership of the wireless unit, the largest mobile operator in the U.S.

"As a wholly owned entity, Verizon Wireless will be better equipped to take advantage of the changing competitive dynamics in the market and capitalize on the continuing evolution of consumer demand for wireless, video, and broadband services," Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam said in a press release.

[ Get expert advice about planning and implementing your BYOD strategy with InfoWorld's 29-page "Mobile and BYOD Deep Dive" PDF special report. | Keep up on key mobile developments and insights with the Mobilize newsletter. ]

The transaction has been unanimously approved by the boards of both companies and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014, subject to customary regulatory approvals. Verizon will pay a combination of cash and stock for Vodafone's stake.

Verizon has sought to buy out its wireless business, originally formed as a joint venture with Vodafone, for several years. The transaction is unlikely to have a significant impact on U.S. mobile consumers, industry analysts said last week. Vodafone may use the huge windfall to buy smaller carriers and further its pursuit of wireline operations, analysts said.

Verizon will pay Vodafone $58.9 billion in cash, financed by a $61 billion bridge credit arrangement from a group of investment banks. It plans to reduce its commitments under that arrangement later by issuing permanent financing. The company will also issue common stock currently valued at about $60 billion to be distributed to Vodafone shareholders, and will issue $5 billion in notes payable to Vodafone. Verizon will sell its 23.1 percent minority stake in Vodafone Omnitel, an Italian mobile operator, to Vodafone for $3.5 billion. The rest of the transaction will be a combination of other considerations, the release said.

Verizon was willing to pay a sky-high price for Vodafone's stake because of the strategic importance of the deal, said Chetan Sharma, founder and president of Chetan Sharma Consulting. "They will be in control of their own destiny and they clearly believe in their future and that the stake will be worth a lot more in a few years," Sharma said.

Because Verizon stock will make up part of the deal, it's a good one for Vodafone, said analyst Roger Entner of Recon Analytics. "This transaction shows continued faith about the outperformance of of Verizon Wireless and the U.S. wireless market in general," Entner said. "It also allows Vodafone to continue to participate in the upside in the U.S."

Stephen Lawson covers mobile, storage, and networking technologies for the IDG News Service. Follow Stephen on Twitter at @sdlawsonmedia. Stephen's e-mail address is stephen_lawson@idg.com.


View the original article here

Update: Microsoft to acquire Nokia's mobile phone business

By John Ribeiro, IDG News ServiceIDG News Service - BANGALORE - Microsoft is to acquire Nokia's Devices & Services business, which includes the smartphone and mobile phones businesses, and license the Finnish company's patents for a total of $7 billion in cash, the companies said Monday.

The Redmond, Washington, software company will pay €3.79 billion for "substantially all" of the Devices & Services business and €1.65 billion to license Nokia's patents at the close of the transaction.

Nokia CEO Stephen Elop will be coming back to Microsoft and lead an expanded devices team, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said in an email to employees. Microsoft said it will draw on its overseas cash resources to fund the transaction.

"Building on the partnership with Nokia announced in February 2011 and the increasing success of Nokia's Lumia smartphones, Microsoft aims to accelerate the growth of its share and profit in mobile devices through faster innovation, increased synergies, and unified branding and marketing," it said in a statement.

Nokia has been building smartphones around Microsoft's Windows Phone operating system in a bid to boost flagging market share, besides focusing on feature phones for emerging markets.

Following the transaction, Nokia plans to focus on its network infrastructure and services business called NSN, its HERE mapping and location services, and Advanced Technologies, focused on technology development and licensing. It will continue to own and maintain the Nokia brand but will license it to Microsoft for a 10-year period to use the brand on current mobile phones and some subsequently developed phones.

Risto Siilasmaa will take over as interim CEO for Nokia while continuing to serve as chairman of Nokia's board. He will have four direct reports: Michael Halbherr, executive vice president of HERE; Elop as executive vice president of Devices & Services; Timo Ihamuotila, Nokia CFO and interim president; and Jesper Ovesen, executive chairman of the NSN board of directors, Nokia said.

The Finnish company will continue to have its headquarters in Finland. About 32,000 people are expected to transfer to Microsoft at closing, including approximately 4,700 people in Finland. Nokia employed about 56,000 people in addition at the end of the second quarter of 2013.

Microsoft will also acquire Nokia's design team, manufacturing and assembly facilities around the world, and operations, sales, marketing and support teams, Ballmer wrote in his email to employees. Ballmer announced recently that he was retiring at some point in the next 12 months from the post of CEO of Microsoft. Elop has been cited in reports as a possible contender for the post.

As part of the transaction, Nokia will give Microsoft a 10 year non-exclusive license to its patents as of the time of the closing, and Microsoft will grant Nokia reciprocal rights related to HERE services. Microsoft will have the option to extend the mutual patent agreement to perpetuity.

Nokia reported a net loss in the second quarter, even as sales of its Lumia smartphones picked up to 7.4 million units. Net sales totalled €5.70 billion in the quarter, down 24% year-on-year.

The company also reported a net loss of €278 million, which was smaller than the year-earlier loss of €1.53 billion. Nokia had a 15.8% share of the mobile phone market in the second quarter to Samsung Electronics' 27.7% and Apple's 8.1%, according to research firm Strategy Analytics.

"This is a smart acquisition for Microsoft, and a good deal for both companies. We are receiving incredible talent, technology and IP. We've all seen the amazing work that Nokia and Microsoft have done together," Ballmer said in the email to employees.

Nokia decided to adopt Windows Phone as its principal smartphone strategy as part of a large deal with Microsoft in February 2011, which included collaboration on joint marketing initiatives and a shared development roadmap.

Success in phones is important to success in tablets, which in turn would help PCs, Microsoft said in presentation slides. Integration of hardware and software will help Microsoft offer competitive alternatives to Apple and Google.

Microsoft's getting into selling smartphones and feature phones may not go down well with some of its hardware partners that use Microsoft software, as they are used to dealing with Microsoft as a supplier of software, rather than as a competitor.

Its own recent bid to counter Apple and Samsung in the tablet market has not been very successful, and the company said in a regulatory filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in July that its Surface tablet had earned revenue of $853 million in its fiscal year ended June 30. The company earlier took a charge for Surface RT inventory adjustments of approximately $900 million.

The transaction with Nokia is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. Microsoft will submit the proposed acquisition for approval in the E.U., U.S., China, India, Brazil, Russia, Canada and other countries.

John Ribeiro covers outsourcing and general technology breaking news from India for The IDG News Service. Follow John on Twitter at @Johnribeiro. John's e-mail address is john_ribeiro@idg.com.

Reprinted with permission from IDG.net. Story copyright 2012 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

View the original article here

Verizon to buy out Vodafone's stake in mobile unit for $130B

IDG News Service - Verizon Communications has reached an agreement to buy Vodafone Group's 45 percent stake in its Verizon Wireless subsidiary for US$130 billion.

Under the deal, Verizon will take 100 percent ownership of the wireless unit, the largest mobile operator in the U.S. This will enhance its ability to offer customers "seamless and integrated services," the carrier said in a press release.

The transaction has been unanimously approved by the boards of both companies and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014, subject to customary regulatory approvals. Verizon will pay a combination of cash and stock for Vodafone's stake.

"As a wholly owned entity, Verizon Wireless will be better equipped to take advantage of the changing competitive dynamics in the market and capitalize on the continuing evolution of consumer demand for wireless, video and broadband services," Verizon Chairman and CEO Lowell McAdam said in the press release.

"This transaction allows both Vodafone and Verizon to execute on their long-term strategic objectives," Vodafone Group CEO Vittorio Colao said in the release. "Our two companies have had a long and successful partnership and have grown Verizon Wireless into a market leader with great momentum. We wish Lowell and the Verizon team continuing success over the years ahead."

Verizon has sought to buy out its wireless business, originally formed as a joint venture with Vodafone, for several years. The transaction is unlikely to have a significant impact on U.S. mobile consumers, industry analysts said last week. Vodafone may use the huge windfall to buy smaller carriers and further its pursuit of wireline operations, analysts said.

Verizon will pay Vodafone $58.9 billion in cash, financed by a $61 billion bridge credit arrangement from a group of investment banks. It plans to reduce its commitments under that arrangement later by issuing permanent financing. The company will also issue common stock currently valued at about $60 billion to be distributed to Vodafone shareholders, and will issue $5 billion in notes payable to Vodafone. Verizon will sell its 23.1 percent minority stake in Vodafone Omnitel, an Italian mobile operator, to Vodafone for $3.5 billion. The rest of the transaction will be a combination of other considerations, the release said.

Verizon was willing to pay a sky-high price for Vodafone's stake because of the strategic importance of the deal, said Chetan Sharma, founder and president of Chetan Sharma Consulting.

"They will be in control of their own destiny and they clearly believe in their future and that the stake will be worth a lot more in a few years," Sharma said in an email interview.

Because Verizon stock will make up part of the deal, it's a good one for Vodafone, said analyst Roger Entner of Recon Analytics.

"This transaction shows continued faith about the outperformance of of VZW and the U.S. wireless market in general," Entner said via email. "It also allows Vodafone to continue to participate in the upside in the U.S."

Stephen Lawson covers mobile, storage and networking technologies for The IDG News Service. Follow Stephen on Twitter at @sdlawsonmedia. Stephen's e-mail address is stephen_lawson@idg.com

Reprinted with permission from IDG.net. Story copyright 2012 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

View the original article here

Verizon shells out $130 billion to Vodafone for mobile unit

Verizon Communications has reached an agreement to buy Vodafone Group's 45 percent stake in its Verizon Wireless subsidiary for $130 billion.

Under the deal, Verizon will take 100 percent ownership of the wireless unit, the largest mobile operator in the U.S. This will enhance its ability to offer customers "seamless and integrated services," the carrier said in a press release.

The transaction has been unanimously approved by the boards of both companies and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014, subject to customary regulatory approvals. Verizon will pay a combination of cash and stock for Vodafone's stake.

"As a wholly owned entity, Verizon Wireless will be better equipped to take advantage of the changing competitive dynamics in the market and capitalize on the continuing evolution of consumer demand for wireless, video and broadband services," Verizon Chairman and CEO Lowell McAdam said in the press release.

"This transaction allows both Vodafone and Verizon to execute on their long-term strategic objectives," Vodafone Group CEO Vittorio Colao said in the release. "Our two companies have had a long and successful partnership and have grown Verizon Wireless into a market leader with great momentum. We wish Lowell and the Verizon team continuing success over the years ahead."

Verizon has sought to buy out its wireless business, originally formed as a joint venture with Vodafone, for several years. The transaction is unlikely to have a significant impact on U.S. mobile consumers, industry analysts said last week. Vodafone may use the huge windfall to buy smaller carriers and further its pursuit of wireline operations, analysts said.

Verizon was willing to pay a sky-high price for Vodafone's stake because of the strategic importance of the deal, said Chetan Sharma, founder and president of Chetan Sharma Consulting.

"They will be in control of their own destiny and they clearly believe in their future and that the stake will be worth a lot more in a few years," Sharma said in an email interview.

Because Verizon stock will make up part of the deal, it's a good one for Vodafone, said analyst Roger Entner of Recon Analytics.

"This transaction shows continued faith about the outperformance of of VZW and the U.S. wireless market in general," Entner said via email. "It also allows Vodafone to continue to participate in the upside in the U.S."

Vodafone is expected to use proceeds of the buyout to shore up its European business.

"What is finally motivating Vodafone is the implementation of their European integrated carrier strategy," Chetan Sharma, founder and president of Chetan Sharma Consulting, told IDG News last week.


View the original article here

Monday, 2 September 2013

Wanted: A truly helpful mobile virtual personal assistant

We've been on the brink of a new relationship with our gadgets for years.

"Real soon now," we're told, mobile apps will interrupt us with personalized information we never asked for. These interruptions would show us opportunities ("Those shirts you like are half-off at the store around the corner"), facilitate our social lives ("Your friend Janet is also visiting New York and is free for lunch—would you like to invite her?") and save our bacon ("You haven't ordered a flower delivery for your anniversary—would you like me to take care of it?").

What are they waiting for?

Apple's Siri responds impressively but doesn't take the initiative to interrupt much.

MindMeld is supposed to ship to general availability an app that churns out information related to your video conversations. The technology and platform look impressive, but the purpose of MindMeld's proof-of-concept app will be context for conversations, not mobile personal assistance.

EasilyDo is supposed to give you predictive results, but like most in this category, you have to work for it. The results are a fraction of what you want, actually harvesting data from social networks, calendars and location-oriented databases and placing them in a stream.

EasilyDo performs a wide variety of useful tasks like contacting people for you, telling you when to leave for your meeting, getting directions, automatically creating new contacts and many other things. EasilyDo automates tasks to simulate a personal assistant, but it doesn't do anything you haven't specifically commanded it to do. It doesn't interrupt you proactively with contextual information beyond things like telling you to leave for your next meeting.

Osito is another cool app that suffers from the same lack of creative interruption as EasilyDo. It's more of a rollup of the kinds of information you can get elsewhere, but presented in a stream with some pop-ups. It's more about automation than contextual assistance.

Foursquare just got interesting. The company rolled out a test version of Foursquare that throws advice and context at you when you walk into a restaurant or around a neighborhood. ("Try the cheese fries in this place—they're incredible.")

Checking in isn't required. In fact, the information will pop up even if the Foursquare app isn't running. Now that's what I'm talking about.

Sadly, the test is for 2000 lucky Android users only, with a wider rollout promised for an unspecified future. Foursquare tested a comparable feature called "Radar" two years ago, but killed it after "Radar" killed battery life.

Google Now has by far the best proactive interruption in the business, if you have an Android device.

Google Now grabs information about you from Gmail, Google Search, and elsewhere, and uses that data to improve results.

Lately, Google has folded in some amazing capabilities. For example, it preemptively feeds you information about your car rentals, public transportation information based on guesses about where you might want to go, movie tickets and sports scores.

Google Now tells you more information about whatever's on screen. It knows what you're watching because, with your permission, it listens to the sound of the show to figure out what you're watching.

Google Now is great in every way except one—it doesn't give you enough information. Leaving Google Now running gives you a mostly static view, with "cards" coming in very infrequently.

Field Trip, another Google product, is wonderful only because of what it promises, not what it delivers.

We learned recently that Field Trip was originally designed for Google Glass but shipped on the iPhone while Glass was still in early development. It's now available on Glass.

Field Trip has the right idea, popping up contextual data. However, these are based on a list of arbitrary database-oriented websites, such as "Historic Detroit," "Public Art Archive," and "San Francisco Architectural Heritage." Unless you're in a major city, Field Trip contextual information is slim pickin's.

There are other services that claim to interrupt with contextual information. But in my experience these require launching the app and refreshing it—a conscious choice followed by deliberate action, which is the opposite of what's promised in this category—interruption.

Looking at these few examples, the industry overall seems hesitant, unwilling or (most likely) unable to meet the promise of interruption for contextual information.

It's true that this category is fraught with hazard. People feel their privacy is being violated when a gadget demonstrates what it knows about them. It's an irrational concern because not letting the user take full advantage of harvested data (as is the case today for most users) doesn't equal privacy, just ignorance.

Users might get overwhelmed by too much interruption data. But there are better ways to stop overload than simply withholding messages. Let it be turned up gradually. Offer a snooze feature. Set times of day. Notify only when moving.

The ideal service would combine the benefits of Foursquare, Google Now and Field Trip. It would give you useful and interesting data not just for general areas or historic landmarks, but down to the specific address level.

It would be like the test version of Foursquare, interrupting you whether the app is running or not.

It would be like Google Now with its uncanny ability to know all about you and learn from your actions.

It would be like Field Trip in bringing in disparate human-curated databases to augment your reality.

Most of all, I would like these services to turn up the fire hose. Limiting access to a handful of users like Foursquare, dribbling out frustrating little bits of data like Google Now, and limiting information sources to a handful of content sources like Field Trip isn't going to cut it.

This category has been full of promise and potential for two years now. The wearable computing category is exploding with activity. It's time for the industry to get over its shyness and start interrupting us with more and better personalized contextual information.

Follow TechHive on Tumblr today.


View the original article here

Are we missing life to focus on our mobile companions?

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

Saturday, 31 August 2013

Salesforce.com mobile app developers gain security tools

Good Technology has integrated its Dynamics Secure Mobility Platform with Salesforce.com's Mobile SDK to help developers build mobile applications that are more secure and easily managed.

The growing popularity of smartphones and tablets combined with the BYOD (bring-your-own-device) trend presents several challenges to IT departments, including developing mobile applications and then efficiently managing and protecting them. Salesforce.com's Mobile SDK (software development kit) helps with the former and Good's Secure Mobility Platform offers the latter.

[ Learn how to work smarter, not harder with InfoWorld's roundup of all the tips and trends programmers need to know in the Developers' Survival Guide. Download the PDF today! | Keep up with the latest developer news with InfoWorld's Developer World newsletter. ]

The goal with the integration is to make it easier for Salesforce.com developers to build apps compatible with Good's containerization technology, which offers features such as app-level encryption as well as compliance and jailbreak detection. Enterprises can also put in place data loss prevention and automated actions that lock and wipe applications without impacting a user's device or personal data, according to Good.

The Mobile SDK, which is available for Android and iOS, is a key part of Salesforce.com's accelerating mobile push. It lets developers choose between building applications directly for Apple and Google's OSes, web applications or so-called hydrid applications -- which make it possible to embed HTML5 apps inside a native container.

Recently, Salesforce.com announced version 2.0 of the SDK, which added the SmartSync data framework allowing developers to create applications that work with data both off and online.

Good isn't the only mobile management tool vendor that's working with Salesforce. On Tuesday, competitor MobileIron announced Anyware. The hosted enterprise mobility management service lets administrators distribute mobile apps to employees as well as manage their devices from the Salesforce administration console, MobileIron said.

Send news tips and comments to mikael_ricknas@idg.com.


View the original article here

Salesforce.com mobile app developers gain security tools

IDG News Service - Good Technology has integrated its Dynamics Secure Mobility Platform with Salesforce.com's Mobile SDK to help developers build mobile applications that are more secure and easily managed.

The growing popularity of smartphones and tablets combined with the BYOD (bring-your-own-device) trend presents several challenges to IT departments, including developing mobile applications and then efficiently managing and protecting them. Salesforce.com's Mobile SDK (software development kit) helps with the former and Good's Secure Mobility Platform offers the latter.

The goal with the integration is to make it easier for Salesforce.com developers to build apps compatible with Good's containerization technology, which offers features such as app-level encryption as well as compliance and jailbreak detection. Enterprises can also put in place data loss prevention and automated actions that lock and wipe applications without impacting a user's device or personal data, according to Good.

The Mobile SDK, which is available for Android and iOS, is a key part of Salesforce.com's accelerating mobile push. It lets developers choose between building applications directly for Apple and Google's OSes, web applications or so-called hydrid applications -- which make it possible to embed HTML5 apps inside a native container.

Recently, Salesforce.com announced version 2.0 of the SDK, which added the SmartSync data framework allowing developers to create applications that work with data both off and online.

Good isn't the only mobile management tool vendor that's working with Salesforce. On Tuesday, competitor MobileIron announced Anyware. The hosted enterprise mobility management service lets administrators distribute mobile apps to employees as well as manage their devices from the Salesforce administration console, MobileIron said.

Send news tips and comments to mikael_ricknas@idg.com

Reprinted with permission from IDG.net. Story copyright 2012 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

View the original article here

Salesforce.com mobile app developers gain security tools

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

Friday, 30 August 2013

Mobile device management shifts to the cloud

New cloud-based software lets employees register, secure, and manage their personal devices without IT department involvement. And a simplified Web interface automates a lot of management tasks.

The software, dubbed Anyware, is completely new code from MobileIron, which originally created a conventional enterprise server application for managing mobile devices. With Anyware, MobileIron intends to become a cloud service that can adapt to handle the mobile management needs of companies large and small.

[ Stay ahead of advances in mobile technology with InfoWorld's Mobile Edge blog and Mobilize newsletter. ]

[KICKOFF:How technology is transforming the NFL]

In a related announcement, MobileIron will offer Anyware specifically integrated with the mobile apps proliferating on the web-based CRM platform Salesforce.com. Currently, Salesforce administrators in the enterprise "have no access to enterprise mobility management," says Ojas Rege, vice president of strategy for MobileIron. That lack is increasingly urgent as more and more mobile apps for Salesforce appear on the vendor's App Exchange. MobileIron will offer "Anyware for Salesforce," which provides from within the Salesforce web interface a range of administrative views, tools, actions, and reports that support a company's mobile Salesforce users.

The initial release of the Anyware cloud service supports iOS and Android devices. End users surf to anywhere.com to register their devices with a username and password, and a device profile is automatically downloaded to their phone or tablet. That's the only step users need to take, according to Rege.

Once registered, users see two icons on their device, one for Anyware and one for the Anyware app catalog, an enterprise-specific site for mobile apps. The catalog is set up by an Anyware administrator, who lists the approved custom and third-party apps that corporate users can, or should, download. The catalog links seamlessly with both Google Play and Apple App Store. As with those online stores, you click on an app in the Anyware catalog and it downloads and installs on your device. And also as with those online stores, users can rate and review the Anyware-listed apps. "This was a huge request from lots and lots of our enterprise customers," says Rege.

Anyware includes a feature to store and then download to a secure on-board container a selection of enterprise documents, which can be stored in different "content catalogs" in the Anyware cloud. One can be for marketing and sales, another for engineering staff. These work-related documents are secured, manageable and kept separate from the personal content on a personally-owned device. It is not intended to be a full-blown document management system or replace them.

Anyware administrators log in via a browser and see a tabbed interface for the Anyware Console. MobileIron has created an extensive set of wizards to guide administrators through tasks such installing certificates, accessing email, configuring Wi-Fi or VPNs, and creating password policies.

Under the "Add Policy" tab, for example, administrators can select from an extensive selection of  ready-to-use templates, such as "compromised devices" for detecting and dealing with jailbroken mobile phones.  

Whether using the Anyware or Anyware for Salesforce interface, administrators don't have to be IT experts to handle these kinds of management policies and tasks, according to MobileIron.


View the original article here

NTIA's mobile privacy push has failed, groups say

IDG News Service - Lobbyists derailed an effort by the Obama administration to create mobile privacy standards, a privacy group charged Thursday, while some participants in the process conceded it lacked focus.

The U.S. National Telecommunications and Information Administration's year-long multistakeholder process on mobile privacy, culminating in July in a proposed code of conduct for mobile app developers, also failed to fully examine mobile data collection efforts and marketing techniques, the Center for Digital Democracy said in a report released Thursday.

"While the [Obama] administration had an opportunity to advance the privacy and consumer protection interests of the American public, it failed to engage in the serious scrutiny and leadership these issues require," Jeffrey Chester, CDD's executive director, wrote in the report. "Missing almost entirely from the more than yearlong discussion was the impact that current digital marketing, mobile, and app-related business models have on the capability of a consumer to make meaningful privacy choices."

The NTIA's decision to separate out mobile privacy for discussion ignored significant cross-platform tracking of consumers, Chester said. The privacy discussions were "dominated by industry lobbyists," leading to weak consumer safeguards, he wrote. Other privacy advocates agreed, saying they were under-represented during the discussions.

The NTIA's process was "really horrible," added Susan Grant, director of consumer protection at the Consumer Federation of America. Grant called on the Obama administration to push for a baseline consumer privacy law during an NTIA meeting Thursday afternoon to discuss lessons learned in the first round of discussions. After a baseline privacy law, multistakeholder discussions could fill in some gaps, Grant said.

The NTIA's process also lacked focus and an agenda and needed more expert testimony about mobile privacy practices, other participants in the discussions said Thursday's meeting at the NTIA. The NTIA has additional privacy discussions planned. The data collection practices discussed during the NTIA meetings often didn't echo real-life practices, said Morgan Reed, executive director at the Association for Competitive Technology, a trade group representing app developers.

Other participants criticized the process for allowing contentious attacks during the discussions.

Some participants defended the NTIA and the process, however. Critics wanting more progress should realize that major change happens "incrementally" in Washington, D.C., said Stuart Ingis, counsel to the Digital Advertising Alliance, a self-regulatory advertising group.

Even though the process was flawed, the group has produced the mobile code of conduct that's now being tested, said Michelle De Mooy, senior associate for national priorities with Consumer Action. With no real deadline in the NTIA process, industry participants had little incentive to move forward with any initiatives, but the group eventually approved the code of conduct, she said.

Reprinted with permission from IDG.net. Story copyright 2012 International Data Group. All rights reserved.

View the original article here