HTC violated two Nokia patents, US trade judge says

Taiwan's HTC has infringed on two patents held by Nokia related to cellphones and tablets, a judge at a powerful U.S. trade court said Monday.

In a preliminary ruling, Judge Thomas Pender of the U.S. International Trade Commission said HTC has infringed U.S. patents 7,415,247 and 6,393,260.

The first covers a method for receiving and transmitting radio signals, and the second a method for eliminating unwanted signals. The two patents were among three that Nokia claimed were used by HTC in its mobile phones.

The third, U.S. patent 5,884,190, covers data communications from a computer to a mobile network. Pender found no infringement of that patent.

The initial decision is expected to be followed by a full decision in the latter part of January 2014.

The ITC has the ability to block any product from being imported into the U.S. if it's found to use technology covered in another company's patent. For that reason, the ITC has become a popular place for tech companies to file infringement cases in the past few years.

The case is investigation 337-TA-847, "Certain electronic devices, including mobile phones and tablet computers, and components thereof," at the ITC in Washington, D.C.

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is martyn_williams@idg.com

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service.
More by Martyn Williams, IDG News Service

View the original article here

New Zealand bans software patents

Service Desk Comparative ReportGartner's recent magic quadrant for IT Service Support Management included no vendors as leaders or innovators. Learn why and how ITinvolve is delivering an innovative service desk solution that empowers IT staff through social collaboration and visualization to improve incident analysis and triage to speed incident resolution time.

Read now »

View the original article here

Google buys augmented reality display patents from Foxconn

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

Don't start selling until you see the whites of their eyes: Google patents "pay-per-gaze" ads

Although we are constantly surrounded by advertisements both online and offline, companies have no way to know whether we’ve actually seen what they’re selling. That could change in the future, with the help of Google Glass.

A newly-discovered Google patent for “pay-per-gaze” ads would use eye tracking to determine what the user is looking at. Google’s patent says it would then be able to charge companies when users look at advertisements, including online banner ads and offline billboards.

These pay-per-gaze ads could go even further, the patent says, by determining how long users have looked directly on an ad, and even measure emotional response.

“For example, if the advertiser desires to generate a shocking advertisement to get noticed or a thought provoking advertisement, then the inferred emotional state information and/or the gazing duration may be valuable metrics to determine the success of the campaign with real-world consumers,” the patent says.

Google’s patent also mentions the ability to provide automatic, augmented reality search results based on eye-tracking. Dubbed “latent pre-searching,” the system would begin its search queries for objects in the user’s peripheral vision, so they’re ready to display by the time they come into focus.

Eye tracking is not a feature that Google Glass currently offers, but the code in Glass’ companion app has hinted at support for “eye gestures” such as winks. Another Google patent has called for even more precise eye tracking, including a way to unlock Glass by tracing a lock pattern with your eyes.

Because these are just patents, there’s no guarantee Google will implement them in Glass or other products. And even if Google did offer eye tracking, it would have to convince people that the benefits outweigh the creepiness of letting the company see what you see. “Latent pre-searching” doesn’t seem like enough of a hook.

Technical hurdles come to mind as well. The current version of Google Glass already suffers from poor battery life, and the power it would take to constantly scan and interpret visual data would likely be immense. It doesn’t seem practical without major breakthroughs in battery efficiency.

Still, recent reports have claimed that the final version of Google Glass may not cost a lot, and the idea of an inexpensive product supplemented by ads definitely fits with Google’s business model. Even if pay-per-gaze isn’t coming soon, it seems like something Google will inevitably try to pull off.

View the original article here